Source: Niemann, G., Winter, H., Höhn, B.-R., & Stahl, K. (2019). Maschinenelemente 1 – Konstruktion und Berechnung von Verbindungen, Lagern, Wellen (5th ed.). Berlin: Springer Vieweg. ISBN 978-3-662-55481-4. Section 10.11, Berechnungsbeispiele (calculation examples), Beispiel 10.1 (Example 10.1), pp. 304–305; some example values: VDI 2230 Part 1:2015-11, steps R3–R8 and R13 (independent hand calculation, inputs from the textbook example).

Calculator: VDI 2230-1 Single-bolt Joint Calculation loads all inputs of this example; press Run Calculation to recompute.

Problem

One M10 hexagon head bolt of strength grade 8.8 clamps two steel flanges. It passes through holes in both parts and is tightened with a nut (through-bolt joint) using a torque wrench, with tightening factor $\alpha_A = 1.4$. The clamping length is $l_K = 50$ mm: 28 mm of shank and 22 mm of free thread. The bearing diameter is $d_W = 14.5$ mm, the hole diameter is $d_h = 11$ mm, and the flange projects 25 mm beyond the bolt, so $D_A = 50$ mm. The bolt and the clamped parts are steel. Each bolt carries a static axial load $F_A = 20\,000$ N; the residual clamp load must stay at least 100 N and the safety margin against exceeding the yield point at least 1.1 (Example 10.1, p. 304).

Recommended design of a bolted joint Recommended design of a bolted joint (Source: Niemann/Winter/Höhn/Stahl, Maschinenelemente 1, 5th ed., Springer Vieweg 2019, Figure 10.34, p. 295)

Inputs

Geometry inputs of this example Geometry inputs of this example (drawn by the MechCalc calculator with this example loaded)

Name Symbol Value
Clamped layers 1, Young’s modulus $E_{P}$ 210000 N/mm²
Strength Class — 8.8
Yield Strength $R_{p0{,}2}$ 640 N/mm²
Tensile Strength † $R_m$ 800 N/mm²
Elastic Modulus $E_S$ 210000 N/mm²
Bolt size $d$ M10
Bearing diameter from product data $d_W$ 14.5 mm
Clamped layers 1, Thickness $h$ 50 mm
Equivalent OD at the interface $D_A$ 50 mm
Through-hole Diameter $d_h$ 11 mm
Unthreaded shank length in the clamp $l_1$ 28 mm
Axial Load $F_A$ 20000 N
Load Introduction Factor $n$ 0.7
Required residual clamp load $F_{KR,req}$ 100 N
Calculation Mode — Verification Mode (specified)
Joint Type — TBJ — Through bolt/DSV
Head Type — Hexagon head (ISO 4014)
Thread Friction † $\mu_{G,min}$ 0.13
Head Friction † $\mu_{K,min}$ 0.13
Tightening Factor $\alpha_A$ 1.4
Embedding $f_Z$ 0.011 mm
Fatigue Check — No

† Not given in the source: The tensile strength $R_m = 800$ N/mm² is the minimum value for grade 8.8 (M16 and below) in Table 10.6 of the same book (p. 270). The coefficient of friction in the thread $\mu_{G,min} = 0.13$ is converted from the only value given, the apparent coefficient of friction of a 60° thread $\mu' = 0.15$ (assumed in the book, p. 304), with $\mu' = \mu/\cos(\alpha/2)$ (Eq. 10.8, p. 268): $\mu_G = 0.15 \times \cos 30^\circ = 0.13$. The coefficient of friction at the head $\mu_{K,min} = 0.13$ is set equal to $\mu_G$, as p. 273 of the book allows.

Calculation Steps

Preload (R1–R6)

Step 5 R3a: Bolt axial resilience $\delta_S$ · VDI 2230 Blatt 1:2015, §5.1.1.1, Eq.(19)

$$\delta_S = \delta_{SK} + \delta_1 + \delta_{Gew} + \delta_{GM}$$

Substitution: $\delta_S = 4.7018 \times 10^{-6}\,\text{mm/N}$ ($l_1 = 28.0\,\text{mm}$, $l_{Gew} = 22.0\,\text{mm}$, head: hex)

$l_{SK} = 0.5\,d$ (Eq.(30)) is given for the medium series of clearance holes (DIN EN 20273)

check the entered $d_h$ against that series

◆ Compared quantity Bolt resilience $\delta_S$ = $4.70185\times10^{-6}$ mm/N; example value $4.64\times10^{-6}$; error +1.33 % (see “Results Comparison” [1])

Step 6 R3b: Clamped-parts resilience $\delta_P$ · VDI 2230 Blatt 1:2015, §5.1.2.1, Eq.(40)

$$\delta_P=\frac{2\ln\left[\frac{(d_W+d_h)(d_W+w l_K\tan\varphi-d_h)}{(d_W-d_h)(d_W+w l_K\tan\varphi+d_h)}\right]}{w E_P\pi d_h\tan\varphi}$$

Substitution: branch ② cone only ($D_A \geq D_{A,Gr}$)

$d_W = 14.50$, $D_A = 50.0$, $d_h = 11.0$, $w = 1$, $\tan\varphi = 0.5688$, $D_{A,Gr} = 42.94$ (mm) → $\delta_P = 7.0829 \times 10^{-7}\,\text{mm/N}$

◆ Compared quantity Clamped-part resilience $\delta_P$ = $7.08291\times10^{-7}$ mm/N; example value $5.6\times10^{-7}$; error +26.48 % (see “Results Comparison” [2])

Step 8 R3d: Load factor $\Phi_n$ · VDI 2230 Blatt 1:2015, R3/3, Eq.(82)

$$\Phi_n = n \cdot \frac{\delta_P + \delta_{PZu}}{\delta_S + \delta_P}$$

Substitution: $\delta_{PZu} = (w-1)\,\delta_M = 0\,\text{mm/N}$

$\Phi_n = 0.7 \cdot (7.0829 \times 10^{-7} + 0) / (4.7018 \times 10^{-6} + 7.0829 \times 10^{-7}) = 0.0916$

◆ Compared quantity Load factor $\Phi$ = 0.0916; example value 0.0754; error +21.49 % (see “Results Comparison” [2])

Step 9 R4: Preload change · VDI 2230, R4/1

$$F_Z = \frac{f_Z}{\delta_S + \delta_P}$$

Substitution: $F_Z = 0.011 / 5.4101 \times 10^{-6} = 2033\,\text{N}$

◆ Compared quantity Preload loss due to embedding $F_Z$ = 2033 N; example value 2115; error -3.88 % (see “Results Comparison” [2])

Step 10 R5: Minimum assembly preload $F_{M\min}$ · VDI 2230, R5/1

$$F_{M\min} = F_{Kerf} + (1-\Phi)\cdot F_A + F_Z + \Delta F'_{Vth}$$

Substitution: $F_{M\min} = 100 + (1-0.0916) \cdot 20000 + 2033 + 0 = 20300\,\text{N}$

◆ Compared quantity Minimum assembly preload $F_{M\min}$ = 20300 N; example value 20300.3; error 0.00 % (see “Results Comparison”)

Step 11 R6: Maximum assembly preload $F_{M\max}$ · VDI 2230, R6/1

$$F_{M\max} = \alpha_A \cdot F_{M\min}$$

Substitution: $F_{M\max} = 1.40 \cdot 20300 = 28420\,\text{N}$

◆ Compared quantity Maximum assembly preload $F_{Mmax}$ = 28420 N; example value 28990; error -1.97 % (see “Results Comparison” [2])

Checks (R7–R13)

Step 12 R7: Permissible assembly preload $F_{Mzul}$ · VDI 2230, R7/2

$$F_{Mzul} = A_0 \cdot \frac{\nu \cdot R_{p0{,}2}}{\sqrt{1+3\left[\frac{3}{2}\frac{d_2}{d_0}\left(\frac{P}{\pi d_2}+1.155\mu_{G\min}\right)\right]^2}}$$

Substitution: $A_0 = 58.0\,\text{mm}^2$, $\nu = 0.9$, $R_{p0,2} = 640.0\,\text{N/mm}^2$ → $F_{Mzul} = 29218\,\text{N}$

◆ Compared quantity Permissible assembly preload $F_{Mzul}$ = 29218 N; example value 29218.4; error 0.00 % (see “Results Comparison”)

Step 16 R8: Working stress check · VDI 2230, R8/1~R8/5 ✔

$$\sigma_{red,B} = \sqrt{\sigma_{z,\max}^2 + 3(k_\tau \cdot \tau_{\max})^2}$$

Substitution: $F_{S\max} = 31051\,\text{N}$, $\sigma_z = 535.4$, $\tau = 214.9$, $\sigma_{red,B} = 566.9$ (N/mm²)

$S_F = 640.0/566.9 = 1.13 \geq 1.0$ → ✅

◆ Compared quantity Safety margin against exceeding the yield point $S_F$ = 1.13; example value 1.257; error -10.10 % (see “Results Comparison” [3])

◆ Compared quantity Maximum bolt load $F_{S\max}$ = 31051 N; example value 31051.3; error 0.00 % (see “Results Comparison”)

◆ Compared quantity Comparative stress in the working state $\sigma_{red,B}$ = 566.9 N/mm²; example value 566.852; error +0.01 % (see “Results Comparison”)

◆ Compared quantity Static strength check: $S_F$ reaches the required value (R8) = Yes; example value Yes; error Match (see “Results Comparison”)

Step 18 R13: Tightening torque $M_A$ · VDI 2230, R13/1 (Eq.127), Eq.128/129

$$D_{Km} = \frac{d_W + D_{Ki}}{2}$$$$M_A = F_{Mzul}\left[0.16P + 0.58 d_2 \mu_{G\min} + \frac{D_{Km}}{2}\mu_{K\min}\right]$$

Substitution: $D_{Km} = (14.50 + 11.00)/2 = 12.75\,\text{mm}$ ($D_{Ki}$ fallback $= d_h$)

$M_A = 29218 \cdot [0.16 \cdot 1.5 + 0.58 \cdot 9.026 \cdot 0.13 + 12.75/2 \cdot 0.13] = 51112\,\text{N}\cdot\text{mm} = 51.1\,\text{N}\cdot\text{m}$

◆ Compared quantity Tightening torque $M_A$ = 51112 N·mm; example value 51112; error 0.00 % (see “Results Comparison”)

Results Comparison

Results Example MechCalc Error (%)
Bolt resilience $\delta_S$ (mm/N) (Step 5) $4.64\times10^{-6}$ $4.70185\times10^{-6}$ +1.33 [1]
Clamped-part resilience $\delta_P$ (mm/N) (Step 6) $5.6\times10^{-7}$ $7.08291\times10^{-7}$ +26.48 [2]
Load factor $\Phi$ (Step 8) 0.0754 0.0916 +21.49 [2]
Preload loss due to embedding $F_Z$ (N) (Step 9) 2115 2033 -3.88 [2]
Maximum assembly preload $F_{Mmax}$ (N) (Step 11) 28990 28420 -1.97 [2]
Safety margin against exceeding the yield point $S_F$ (Step 16) 1.257 1.13 -10.10 [3]
Bolt resilience $\delta_S$ (mm/N) (Step 5) $4.70185\times10^{-6}$ $4.70185\times10^{-6}$ 0.00
Clamped-part resilience $\delta_P$ (mm/N) (Step 6) $7.08291\times10^{-7}$ $7.08291\times10^{-7}$ 0.00
Load factor $\Phi$ (Step 8) 0.0916434 0.0916 -0.05
Preload loss due to embedding $F_Z$ (N) (Step 9) 2033.22 2033 -0.01
Minimum assembly preload $F_{M\min}$ (N) (Step 10) 20300.3 20300 0.00
Maximum assembly preload $F_{Mmax}$ (N) (Step 11) 28420.5 28420 0.00
Permissible assembly preload $F_{Mzul}$ (N) (Step 12) 29218.4 29218 0.00
Maximum bolt load $F_{S\max}$ (N) (Step 16) 31051.3 31051 0.00
Comparative stress in the working state $\sigma_{red,B}$ (N/mm²) (Step 16) 566.852 566.9 +0.01
Safety margin against exceeding the yield point $S_F$ (Step 16) 1.12904 1.13 +0.09
Tightening torque $M_A$ (N·mm) (Step 18) 51112 51112 0.00
Static strength check: $S_F$ reaches the required value (R8) (Step 16) Yes Yes Match
  • [1] The textbook uses a head length of $0.4d$ (Eq. 10.26); the calculator uses $0.5d$ for a hexagon head (VDI 2230:2015, Eq. 30), so $\delta_S$ is 1.33 % larger.
  • [2] Different clamped-part models: the textbook uses the 1986 substitute cylinder ($\delta_P = 5.6\times10^{-7}$), the calculator uses the 2015 deformation cone ($7.08\times10^{-7}$); $\Phi$, $F_Z$ and $F_{Mmax}$ follow. The example value of $\Phi$ is converted from the book’s $F_{SA} = 1508$ N and $F_A = 20\,000$ N: $\Phi_n = 1508/20\,000 = 0.0754$ (the printed $\Phi = 0.1077$ is not multiplied by $n$).
  • [3] The textbook prints $S_F = 1.257$ (p. 305, Eq. 10.75), which contradicts its own Eqs. (10.74)–(10.75): with $F_{Smax} = F_{Mmax} + F_{SA} = 30\,498$ N they give 0.9935 (the printed value comes out with the pre-selection $F_{Smax} = 20\,140$ N of Eq. 10.68; the book does not say so, this is an inference). By the textbook’s own formulas $S_F < S_{F,min} = 1.1$, so its pass verdict does not hold; the calculator gives 1.13 from VDI 2230:2015, step R8 (a different basis), and still passes.