<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>SINTAP on MechCalc how-to Guide</title>
    <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/tags/sintap/</link>
    <description>Recent content in SINTAP on MechCalc how-to Guide</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/tags/sintap/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>FITNET: The Origins of Europe&#39;s Unified Fitness-for-Service Procedure</title>
      <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/fitnet-ffs-overview/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/fitnet-ffs-overview/</guid>
      <description>In the fracture-mechanics and fitness-for-service (FFS) literature, FITNET is a name you cannot avoid. This article traces the origins of the FITNET EU project from public sources: how it descends from SINTAP, who led and funded it, its scale, what the four modules of the FITNET FFS Procedure each cover, and why its fracture module is highly comparable to BS 7910.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
