<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>FITNET on MechCalc how-to Guide</title>
    <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/tags/fitnet/</link>
    <description>Recent content in FITNET on MechCalc how-to Guide</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/tags/fitnet/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Re-running FITNET SSTP10 with MechCalc: FAD Assessment of a Through-Thickness Crack and an L_r Cross-Check</title>
      <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/bs7910-sstp10-fad-walkthrough/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/bs7910-sstp10-fad-walkthrough/</guid>
      <description>FITNET&amp;#39;s second FAD worked example, SSTP10 — a welded stainless-steel wide plate with a through-thickness crack failing by ductile tearing. This post runs it in mechCalc&amp;#39;s BS 7910 Clause 7 fracture assessment calculator, watches where the assessment point lands on the Failure Assessment Diagram, and cross-checks point by point against FITNET: the horizontal coordinate L_r matches almost digit-for-digit (0.511 vs 0.51), while the vertical coordinate K_r is cross-method (the source includes unquantified welding residual stress), so only L_r can be compared.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FITNET: The Origins of Europe&#39;s Unified Fitness-for-Service Procedure</title>
      <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/fitnet-ffs-overview/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/fitnet-ffs-overview/</guid>
      <description>In the fracture-mechanics and fitness-for-service (FFS) literature, FITNET is a name you cannot avoid. This article traces the origins of the FITNET EU project from public sources: how it descends from SINTAP, who led and funded it, its scale, what the four modules of the FITNET FFS Procedure each cover, and why its fracture module is highly comparable to BS 7910.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
