<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Fitness-for-Service on MechCalc how-to Guide</title>
    <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/tags/fitness-for-service/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Fitness-for-Service on MechCalc how-to Guide</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/tags/fitness-for-service/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>BS 7910 Annex D: How a Misaligned Weld Forces a Layer of Bending Stress</title>
      <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/bs7910-annex-d-misalignment/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/bs7910-annex-d-misalignment/</guid>
      <description>When two plates or shells to be welded together are &amp;#39;not aligned&amp;#39; (axial misalignment or angular distortion), the load path of a tensile load is forced to bend, adding a layer of local bending stress σs at the weld. BS 7910:2019 Annex D is a look-up handbook: it gives a formula for each of 10 standardized misalignment configurations (7 butt-joint types &#43; 3 cruciform types), letting you compute σs directly from the geometry, or convert it to a stress magnification factor km to feed into the Annex M stress intensity factor and the Clause 7 fracture assessment. This article gives the physics, then a figure and algorithm for each type.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Problem 1 LLAW: How far does residual stress push the assessment point past the FAL? — An A533B as-welded, low-temperature FAD walkthrough</title>
      <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/bs7910-a533b-llaw-fad-walkthrough/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/bs7910-a533b-llaw-fad-walkthrough/</guid>
      <description>One of the four A533B-1 welded-plate problems: the LLAW specimen — as-welded, −120 ℃, low load ratio. It is the first of the four to fracture (1.27 MN). This post walks step by step through entering, computing, and reading the FAD in mechCalc&amp;#39;s BS 7910 Clause 7 Fracture Assessment Calculator, to see exactly how the residual K_I^S of 46 MPa·m^0.5 pushes the assessment point to K_r=2.59, far beyond the Failure Assessment Line.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FITNET: The Origins of Europe&#39;s Unified Fitness-for-Service Procedure</title>
      <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/fitnet-ffs-overview/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/fitnet-ffs-overview/</guid>
      <description>In the fracture-mechanics and fitness-for-service (FFS) literature, FITNET is a name you cannot avoid. This article traces the origins of the FITNET EU project from public sources: how it descends from SINTAP, who led and funded it, its scale, what the four modules of the FITNET FFS Procedure each cover, and why its fracture module is highly comparable to BS 7910.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BS 7910 FAD Assessment: What Residual Stress Does, Seen Through a FITNET Case</title>
      <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/bs7910-a533b-residual-stress-fad/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/bs7910-a533b-residual-stress-fad/</guid>
      <description>A set of large welded A533B-1 steel plates tested in four-point bending to fracture, built to answer a question engineers keep asking: where exactly does welding residual stress push the assessment point on the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD)? We first lay out the background and the shared method, then break the four specimens (LLAW / LLHT / HLAW / HLHT) into four problems, give the FAD inputs and results for each, and re-run everything independently with mechCalc&amp;#39;s BS 7910 Clause 7 fracture assessment, cross-checking point by point against the original literature.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is Fitness-for-Service (FFS) Assessment?</title>
      <link>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/ffs-intro/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://mechcalc.net/blog/en/posts/ffs-intro/</guid>
      <description>FFS in one minute: can a structure with a flaw keep running? What methods do engineers use to decide?</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
