🧮 在线计算器VDI 2230 Bolted Joint Calculation — The full 14-step calculation chain (R0–R13), with six strength checks.

Full worked example: tapped-thread joint (ESV)

This article is a counterpart to the DSV example (article 8) . It highlights the differences unique to ESV: $w = 2$, $E_M = E_{BI}$, the cone-angle formula Eq. 42, and the R11 engagement-depth check.

Engineering problem statement

A bolt is screwed from the top into a cast-iron housing (grey cast iron GJL-250), fixing a steel cover plate.

Parameter Value Note
Joint type ESV (tapped-thread) Bolt screwed into the cast-iron housing
External axial force $F_A = 15\,000$ N (static)
External transverse force $F_Q = 0$ N No transverse force
Sealing requirement $A_D = 800$ mm², $p_{i\max} = 10$ MPa O-ring seal
Clamp length $l_K = 30$ mm Steel cover-plate thickness
Clamped-parts outer diameter $D_A = 40$ mm
Cover-plate material Steel, $E_P = 210\,000$ MPa
Housing material GJL-250, $E_{BI} = 100\,000$ MPa
Operating temperature Room temperature $\Delta F'_{Vth} = 0$
Friction coefficient $\mu_G = \mu_K = 0.14$
Load introduction factor $n = 0.5$
Tightening method Precision torque wrench $\alpha_A = 1.6$

R0 — preliminary diameter selection

Select M12 × 1.75, property class 10.9 (same parameters as article 8).

Limit check (Eq. R0/2):

$$ G' \approx (1.5 \dots 2) \cdot d_W = (1.5 \dots 2) \times 16.6 = 24.9 \dots 33.2 \text{ mm} $$

$c_T = D_A = 40$ mm → exceeds $G'_{\max} \approx 33.2$ mm; the standard warns the accuracy may drop (VDI 2230:2015, Eq. 55). But it does not yet exceed $G'_{\max} \approx 3 \times 16.6 = 49.8$ mm (Eq. 56), so the calculation can continue.

R1 — tightening factor

$$ \alpha_A = 1.6 $$

R2 — required minimum clamping force

No transverse force → $F_{KQ} = 0$

Sealing requirement (Eq. R2/2):

$$ F_{KP} = A_D \cdot p_{i\max} = 800 \times 10 = 8\,000 \text{ N} $$$$ F_{Kerf} = F_{KP} = 8\,000 \text{ N} $$

R3 — elastic resiliences and force ratio

⚠️ The ESV vs DSV difference in δS

The overall bolt-resilience formula is unchanged (Eq. 19), but the nut region $\delta_M$ is different (VDI 2230:2015, §5.1.1.1):

Parameter DSV ESV
$l_M$ $0.4d = 4.8$ mm $0.33d = 3.96$ mm (Eq. 27)
$E_M$ $E_S = 210\,000$ $E_{BI} = 100\,000$

ESV bolt resilience $\delta_S$:

Segment Length Cross-section area $\delta_i$
Head $\delta_{SK}$ 6 mm 113.1 $2.53 \times 10^{-7}$
Shank $\delta_1$ 10 mm 113.1 $4.22 \times 10^{-7}$
Free thread $\delta_{Gew}$ 20 mm 76.2 $1.25 \times 10^{-6}$
Engaged segment $\delta_G$ $0.5 \times 12 = 6$ mm 76.2 $3.75 \times 10^{-7}$
Nut $\delta_M$ 3.96 mm 113.1 ($E_{BI}$) $3.50 \times 10^{-7}$
$$ \delta_S = (2.53 + 4.22 + 12.50 + 3.75 + 3.50) \times 10^{-7} = 2.65 \times 10^{-6} \text{ mm/N} $$

[!IMPORTANT] In ESV, δM uses the clamped-part elastic modulus This is the most notable difference between ESV and DSV — the elastic modulus of the nut region takes the cast iron’s $E_{BI} = 100\,000$ MPa, not the bolt steel’s 210,000 MPa. For an aluminium-alloy housing ($E_{BI} \approx 70\,000$ MPa), this effect is even more marked (VDI 2230:2015, §5.1.1.1, p.42).

ESV clamped-parts resilience $\delta_P$

For ESV the joint coefficient $w = 2$ and the cone angle uses Eq. 42:

$$ \beta_L = l_K / d_W = 30 / 16.6 = 1.81 $$$$ y = D_A' / d_W = 40 / 16.6 = 2.41 $$$$ \tan\varphi_E = 0.348 + 0.013\ln(1.81) + 0.193\ln(2.41) = 0.348 + 0.008 + 0.170 = 0.526 $$

Limiting diameter (Eq. 39, $w = 2$):

$$ D_{A,Gr} = 16.6 + 2 \times 30 \times 0.526 = 48.2 \text{ mm} $$

$D_A = 40 < D_{A,Gr} = 48.2$ → use Eq. 41 (cone + sleeve):

$$ \delta_P = \frac{\frac{2}{2 \times 13.5 \times 0.526}\ln\left[\frac{(16.6+13.5)(40-13.5)}{(16.6-13.5)(40+13.5)}\right] + \frac{4}{40^2-13.5^2}\left[30-\frac{40-16.6}{2 \times 0.526}\right]}{210\,000 \times \pi} $$

Logarithmic term: $\ln\left[\frac{30.1 \times 26.5}{3.1 \times 53.5}\right] = \ln(4.81) = 1.571$

Sleeve-length check: $l_K - \frac{D_A - d_W}{w \cdot \tan\varphi} = 30 - \frac{23.4}{1.052} = 30 - 22.2 = 7.8$ mm

$$ \delta_P = \frac{\frac{2 \times 1.571}{14.21} + \frac{4 \times 7.8}{1417.8}}{659\,734} = \frac{0.221 + 0.022}{659\,734} = 3.68 \times 10^{-7} \text{ mm/N} $$

Force ratio Φ

$$ \Phi = 0.5 \times \frac{3.68 \times 10^{-7}}{2.65 \times 10^{-6} + 3.68 \times 10^{-7}} = 0.5 \times 0.122 = 0.061 $$

R4 — preload change

$f_Z$: bolt head 3 μm + thread (cast iron, rough) 5 μm + 1 interface 3 μm = 11 μm

Note: cast-iron surface roughness is larger, so the embedding is taken as a higher value from Table 5.

$$ F_Z = \frac{0.011}{3.02 \times 10^{-6}} = 3\,642 \text{ N} $$

R5 — minimum assembly preload

$$ F_{M\min} = 8\,000 + (1-0.061) \times 15\,000 + 3\,642 = 8\,000 + 14\,085 + 3\,642 = 25\,727 \text{ N} $$

R6 — maximum assembly preload

$$ F_{M\max} = 1.6 \times 25\,727 = 41\,163 \text{ N} $$

R7 — assembly stress check

$F_{MTab}$(M12-10.9, $\mu = 0.14$) ≈ 57 000 N (Table A1)

$$ F_{Mzul} \approx 57\,000 \geq 41\,163 \quad → \quad ✅ $$

M12-10.9 is enough! (In contrast to the DSV example — for ESV the transverse force is zero and the sealing clamping force is smaller, so M12 passes.)

R8–R12 check summary

Step Check item Computed value Allowable value Safety factor Result
R8 Service stress $F_{S\max} = 57\,000 + 0.061 \times 15\,000 = 57\,915$ N $R_{p0.2} \times A_S = 79\,242$ N $S_F = 1.37$
R9 Fatigue $\sigma_a = 0$ (static load)
R10 Bearing pressure $p = 57\,000 / A_{p\min}$ $p_G$(GJL-250) ≈ 460 MPa needs verification
R11 Engagement depth see below
R12 Slip $F_Q = 0$ → not needed

R11 — engagement-depth check (ESV-specific)

This is a check step unique to ESV (VDI 2230:2015, §5.5.5, Eq. R11/1).

For GJL-250 (grey cast iron, $R_m \approx 250$ MPa), the standard Bild 36 gives:

$$ m_{eff}/d \approx 1.8 \quad \text{(steel bolt 10.9 into grey cast iron)} $$$$ m_{eff\min} = 1.8 \times 12 = 21.6 \text{ mm} $$

Design recommendation: an engagement depth of at least 22 mm, to make sure the thread is not stripped.

[!IMPORTANT] ESV engagement depth varies greatly with the housing material

  • Steel on steel: $m_{eff}/d \approx 0.8 \sim 1.0$
  • Steel on cast iron: $m_{eff}/d \approx 1.5 \sim 2.0$
  • Steel on aluminium alloy: $m_{eff}/d \approx 2.0 \sim 2.5$

The softer the housing material, the greater the required engagement depth (VDI 2230:2015, §5.5.5, Bild 36).

R13 — tightening torque

$$ M_A = 57\,000 \times [0.16 \times 1.75 + 0.58 \times 10.863 \times 0.14 + \frac{14.9}{2} \times 0.14] $$$$ = 57\,000 \times [0.28 + 0.882 + 1.043] \times 10^{-3} = 57\,000 \times 2.205 \times 10^{-3} $$$$ M_A \approx 126 \text{ N·m} $$

DSV vs ESV comparison summary

Item Article 8 DSV (M16-10.9) This article ESV (M12-10.9)
Joint coefficient $w$ 1 2
Cone-angle formula Eq. 43 Eq. 42
$E_M$ (nut region) $E_S = 210\,000$ $E_{BI} = 100\,000$
$l_M$ (nut substitutional length) $0.4d$ $0.33d$
R11 engagement depth ❌ not applicable ✅ must be checked
Governing design factor Transverse force $F_{KQ}$ Sealing $F_{KP}$

Data basis and accuracy statement

All formulas in this article are from VDI 2230 Blatt 1:2015-11. The thread parameters are from DIN 13-1. The GJL-250 mechanical properties are from DIN EN 1561.

Disclaimer: This article is for engineering teaching reference only.


📚 Series navigation

← Previous: Full Worked Example (DSV)Next: Eccentric Load and Bending-Moment Effect →